
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
<title>Bw4/Bw6</title>
<link>https://www.ashi-hla.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371451</link>
<description></description>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 6 Jun 2026 11:57:11 GMT</lastBuildDate>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 16:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
<copyright>Copyright &#xA9; 2017 American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics</copyright>
<atom:link href="https://www.ashi-hla.org/forums/topic_rss.asp?id=1371451" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link>
<item>
<title>Bw4/Bw6</title>
<link>https://www.ashi-hla.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371451</link>
<guid>https://www.ashi-hla.org/forums/posts.aspx?topic=1371451</guid>
<description><![CDATA[Hi, All, <br />
We all know that the Bw4 or Bw6 pattern on SAB is something to be very careful about. However, I could not find hard evidence on the clinical significance of very <g data-gr-id="200" id="200" class="gr_ gr_200 gr-alert gr_spell gr_inline_cards gr_run_anim ContextualSpelling multiReplace">low level</g> anti-Bw4 or anti-Bw6. <br />
If you see a distinct but very low "hill" of Bw4 or Bw6 (MFI below 1000) in a Bw6/6 or Bw4/4 candidate, and a surrogate crossmatch is negative, would you list Bw4 or Bw6 as avoids at UNOS? (which will exclude 60-90% of the donors)<br />
If no and the patient receives a graft with the corresponding epitope, do you routinely recommend prophylactic rituximab to prevent AMR? <br />
Thank you so much for sharing your thoughts!<br />
Sincerely, <br />
Chang Liu, MD PhD<br />
HLA laboratory, Wash U/Barnes-Jewish Hospital]]></description>
<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2017 17:55:45 GMT</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
